Lowdown: A southern love triangle set around the American civil war.
Review:
One of the more amusing feuds I have
had with my mother had to do with which of the two is the best film
ever. To this young child, Star Wars looked the undeniable winner; my
mother always went with 1939’s Gone with the Wind. Silly choice, if
you ask me: how can a love story even begin to compare with death
stars?
Oddly enough for a movie fan such as
yours truly, who also happens to be the son of my mother, I never
watched Gone with the Wind till last week (at least not in full).
Having watched it I can rest assured now that my childhood preferences were,
indeed, valid: Gone with the Wind is a classic for historical
reasons, but Star Wars beats the hell out of it.
The story takes place at America’s
south, specifically in Georgia, at around the time of the American
Civil War. Our hero is Scarlett O’Hara (Vivian Lee), the spoiled
daughter of a plantation owner from Ireland. Scarlett is admired by
all the men around her, but she truly covets a guy who happens to be
committed to another woman. Scarlett will stop at nothing to be with "her" man, including marrying other men altogether. In between that and the war, Scarlett gets exposed to the flamboyant Rhett
Butler (Clark Gable), a sort of a playboy whose allegiances are vague
but who, nevertheless, is the only one who recognizes Scarlett for the smart manipulator
she really is. The rest of this overly long (close to four hours)
film is the tale of the love triangle between Scarlett, the guy she
really loves, and Rhett. The tale is made more interesting, of
course, by the war setting and the character
building exercise it proves to be.
So no, I didn’t like Gone with the
Wind. Obviously, I found it too long, even if the story is
conveniently divided into two halves (before and after the war) and
even if we watched each half on a different seating. Scarlett’s
annoying character is a major problem, too – she is far too
annoying to sympathise or identify with, which left me un-associated
with any of the characters for the whole movie. There is also the
rather annoying way blacks are treated by the film as comic relief material; then again, at the time Gone with the Wind was made racism was
more than politically correct, it was politically endorsed.
Most of all, though, I was annoyed with
the over-acting rampant in Gone with the Wind. None of the characters
act naturally; they all behave as if they’re playing at the theater
all the time, or even worse. It made Gone with the Wind Go on my Nerves: people just don’t talk like that to one another. I guess
one can therefore argue that through Gone with the Wind we are able
to see just how far the art of movie making has advanced since. Or
did it, really, given the artificial taste most contemporary
Hollywood films leave in my mouth?
Best scenes: Being that Gone with the
Wind is as classic as any movie can ever aspire to be, it is full of
quotes one keeps on hearing everywhere. My favorite would have to be
Rhett’s “Frankly, my dear, I don’t give a damn”, because it
encapsulates exactly what I felt about the movie after watching it
for around four hours. Second place goes for the immediately
following “After all... tomorrow is another day” by Scarlett,
because it concludes the film (by which time I was perfectly able to forgive the rather detached manner in which this statement was made: it doesn't have much to do with the feel of the film that preceded it).
Overall: Worth watching to understand
what the fuss is all about; however, I do advise preparing for a disappointment.
2 out of 5 stars.

5 comments:
you can read the book. it's much longer. you can get it for free at your local gutenberg project (although not formatted).
it was a favorite of my mom's as well (the book and the movie).
I don't think there's much danger of me reading the book. I have such a long queue of obviously excellent books on my Kindle already it's not funny, and besides - I should read All Clear first.
From new SFWA Grand Master Connie Willis.
I still think her shorter books are better.
And to me it reads like you're going through great lengths to convince me not to support this year's con. Not that I am trying to detract anything from Willis' achievements; it's just that it becomes clearer and clearer I am quite detached from the contemporary science fiction scene, even if I enjoy the genre.
I basically agree with your criticisms, but with all its faults I do like the film. Mostly because, as you said, it is a classic.
I don't expect you to run out and read the book, but I read it after having seen the movie, and wow...the book is excellent. As Uri said, it's about 1000 pages so it's an undertaking, but it's very well-written and much less superficial than the film (and doesn't have the overacting). Scarlett is not a likeable character in the book or the movie, but in the book you get a much deeper, comprehensive look into her psyche and it's fascinating.
Post a Comment